Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Realization of this fact can be pretty humiliating. Just a few minutes ago, I called up our governor to plead for a loan. Not for personal or business reasons, which would or should result in some earning, but in order to augment funds for our people who are running in Monday's barangay elections. This is not something I usually do. In fact, I hate what I did. The only saving grace about it is that it is a loan that I was asking for, not a dole-out.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
Bring Government Back to the People: Paglaum, Lanang!
(A Vision of, and a Statement of Belief in, a Better Lanang)
Election season is upon us once again. This phenomenon which occurs every three years brings with it the despicable spectacle of people transformed into commodities, selling their votes to the highest bidder and turning democracy into cattle on the auction block.
Many of us abhor this practice. In an ideal society, democracy should be the process where citizens are given the opportunity to intelligently choose their leaders. The entablado is supposed to be a place for the airing competing political views and platforms of government so people can choose those who would hold the reins of government.
But the reality of Philippine politics is vastly different. In our country – and Lanang is no exception – politicians seek to be elected not so they can serve those who vote for them. Rather, elections are used as a means to access power and the opportunities to commit graft and corruption that come with power. Thus, we see congressmen whose aims are to fatten their bank accounts, build mansions and air-conditioned cockpits, and collect mistresses for their harems … the roads of their congressional district be damned. And we see national leaders whose sole aim is to preserve themselves in power by pretending to be blind to the plunder of the nation’s wealth by congressmen and local officials.
The Vicious Cycle of Philippine Politics
There is a direct relation between the phenomenon of vote-selling and the intentional neglect of politicians. For the politicians, an “investment” of P500 to P1000 per voter every three years brings with it untold returns in terms of 10%-15% payola from public contractors, as well as the occasional shakedown of legitimate businessmen in the guise of “investigation in aid of legislation”. It is to the benefit of politicos to keep their constituents mired in poverty and ignorance, because they know that progress and wisdom will cause them to lose their grip on power. For the electorate, selling their votes give them direct benefits – if only for the short term – of being able to buy half a sack of rice and a box of canned goods on the day after elections. The benefits are temporary, but they are sought because they know that for the next three years their needs will be forgotten and neglected anyway.
The two principal characters – politicians and voters – thus feed upon themselves in a vicious circle where people sell their votes for temporary relief from the oppression of poverty and politicians buy the votes for access to power and pelf. These vicious circles are found in varying degrees of extent and intensity from the barangay up to the national levels of governance.
This must be put to a stop.
Breaking the Cycle by Confronting the Issues
The solution is to get back to the true meaning of democracy as articulated by President Abraham Lincoln – “Democracy is a government of the people, by the people, and for the people.” Kuha-on an pang-gobyernohan tikan han mga politico ngan ibalik ngadto han tawo!
Bringing the government back to the people where it belongs means having a local government responsive to the plight of its people. This will require confronting the following issues head-on:
Economic - The available resources must be availed of to their full potentials.
Coconut farming is the predominant economic activity, and yet we still dry our copra in streets and sell them in Tacloban. In the technological world we live in, this is unforgivable. We must bring technology to Lanang by producing not just the raw material (copra) but also the processed and, if possible, the final consumer product that we can introduce into the national market.
Except for paltry efforts individual fishermen who invoke the image of Hemingway’s “The Old Man and the Sea,” the marine resources of the
Perhaps the most overlooked assets of Lanang are its places of incomparable beauty. Bacayawan beach, now marketed through the internet, has been visited sporadically by tourists both foreign and domestic. Still underdeveloped are the attractions of
Infrastructure – Public infrastructure are necessary to pull Lanang out of poverty.
The highways built in the 1980s have badly deteriorated over the years. Between So-ong and Tabok, and from Aronghol to
A comprehensive infrastructure action plan must be put in place. Based on the needs of the various barangays, developmental infrastructure will be designed. If farmers need roads to bring their produce to town, then farm-to-market roads will be built. If fisherfolk need a port to bring in their catch, then a fishing port will have to be built. To do this, we can have access to national government funds, as well as “overseas development funds”.
Besides the physical infrastructure, technological advances need to be introduced to Lanang. Although both Smart and Globe have already put up cell sites, there is still as yet no respectable internet penetration except for those with 3G cellphones. An internet kiosk can be established that will serve as the gateway for Lanangnons to access the vast information available on the World Wide Web.
Environment – Progress would be meaningless if we destroy our environment in the process.
A balance must be maintained between the demands of development and the obligation to conserve the environment.
The extraction of sand and gravel –necessary in the building of houses and public infrastructures – needs to be properly regulated.
The felling of trees for lumber – also necessary for the construction of homes and furniture – must be approached in a rational manner. A total log ban is unrealistic. Instead, there should be regulatory measures in place, including the replacement of felled trees through a viable reforestation program.
Peace and Order – These twin objectives are inextricably twined with the ethos and morals of a community.
Programs and ordinances – both preventive and remedial – must be set in place to prevent the proliferation of drug and substance abuse, illegal gambling, as well as youthful prostitution. Hand in hand with school authorities and with private sector, the energies of young men and women need to be channeled to constructive activities that will equip them with the necessary skills to face the future.
Rewarding positive behavior and penalizing negative acts is a vital function not only of the family but also of the community. Where windows are broken, we must fix them. Dirty cops, no matter whose relatives they are, must be hailed before the courts of law and face the consequences of their actions.
And when children and the youth see that their elders abide by a code of accepted behavior, they will have stronger characters and not be easily led astray by the temptations of drugs and other criminal acts.
Cultural and Historical – “Ang ’di marunong lumingon sa pinanggalingan, ay ’di makakarating sa paroroonan.” So goes the observation of our national hero, Dr. Jose Rizal.
The last event of global significance that had a direct affected Lanang was World War II. The veterans – who experienced the war as guerillas or by way of administrative support – are now in the twilight of their years, soon to fade away. Yet no steps have been taken to write down their stories and preserve them not only for ourselves but also for generations to come. The same is true for Lanangnons who have shown excellence, in the local and national arenas as well abroad. It is high time that Lanang give due recognition to its sons and daughters by acknowledging their achievements.
Interaction with the national culture – as well as the effect of intrusions of cable and satellite TV – have also led to the dilution of the culture that was and is distinctly Lanang. We cannot prevent the intermix of cultures – both domestic and international – but we should take steps to ensure that they are at least remembered and honored.
It is important, therefore, that the municipal government initiate the creation of a cultural and historical society that will preserve the memory of what was Lanang.
Only by addressing these issues can government once again be brought to the people of Lanang.
Many of our fellow Lanangnons have chosen to live their lives outside of their hometown. They believe that staying in Lanang would only lead to professional and financial stagnation. Considering the realities of our town (and our country), they have good reasons to leave. And the best proof that they are correct is how well they have done in Metro Manila, in Mindanao, in
But we also believe that we cannot give up on Lanang. Lanang is, in the words of an old song, “an iroy nga tuna”. It is our hometown, the place where we came from, and the place where we shall return even only in spirit.
If we believe in this, then what we have learned, and what we have earned, in other places can and should be brought back to lift Lanang from the morass it finds itself in.
The task of addressing the issues confronting our town can be made easier if we have political leaders who are knowledgeable of the situation and who have the capability to do something about it.
We need to elect people who will be governed by the principle that to be a leader means to serve.
We need to install leaders who will be guided not by selfish motives of power and greed but by the interests of our people.
We need to have leaders who will bring back hope to Lanang.
Sunday, January 14, 2007
Philippine Elections – Will They Ever Change?
(Or, to the gallows with Garci!)
Just this afternoon I received information that the registered voters in our small town of
Surely the 600% spike in the number of registered voters cannot be attributed to a sudden population boom. Only rabbits, with their legendary fecundity, can populate any land area that fast in that short a time. There must be some reason other than human reproduction, and I think I know why.
As far as I can remember, elections in our town have always been characterized by vote-buying. During the Marcos times, voters would be given a token amount of P20, sufficient to buy two gallons of tuba and maybe a tin of sardines or so. “Pahalipay,” “hokip,” “ta-ta” were various words they used to describe it – a gift in exchange for the bother of casting one’s vote.
Everything changed commencing with the Aquino administration. Maybe the voters got greedy. Or, as theorized by some, politicians unable to present any other sterling qualification to the voters decided that they could buy votes instead. Thus, from the P20 of the Marcos era, it became common in our town to buy one’s vote for P500. Then it became P800 per vote. Then P1000, and so on and so forth. As of the last election, one vote had the monetary equivalent of P2500-P3000! Like poker players, the politicians raised the ante with each election period until the roots of greed took hold of the electorate and can be banished no more … at least not in the near future.
The last time my Dad ran for the mayorship of our town was in 1995. Votes, at that time, were already being sold for P1000 each. His campaign chest already depleted, he remarked wryly in frustration as he visited the barangays to thank his supporters, “This is like going to SM Megamall with only fare money in you pocket – so many things to buy, but nothing to buy them with!”
Oh, and the so-called principled Left is no different. Ensconced in the hinterland barangays, these self-styled revolutionaries extort “access fees” from politicians in exchange for allowing them to hold electoral meetings in these barangays. And come election day, they coerce the villagers to vote for the ticket of the politicians who gave them the highest “access fee” – which need not necessarily be cash, but can come in the form of guns, camouflage uniforms, or even a pledge to give support in the future in exchange for the votes of the villagers.
One cannot blame the syanos for selling their votes. After all, a lifetime or two of experience tells them that they get to see politicians only during election period. After that, they have never seen – nor can they expect to see – any of the campaign promises become reality. They know fully well that when a politician takes to the stage he or she is just a bag of air who will promise everything and deliver nothing. So a typical syano would tell himself, “Better to sell my vote to the highest bidder. That way, at least I get something out of these bastard politicians.” The same holds true for the “revolutionary” Left, a sector in society that has never recognized the legitimacy of elections in this country.
That’s why, if true, the abnormal increase of registered voters in our town of
“Where are the authorities? Why can’t they do anything about these flying voters?”
So a sensible person would ask.
In the first place, these non-residents would not have been able to register as voters in Llorente had it not been for the Election Registration Board (ERB). By law, this is composed of the Municipal Election Officer, the Municipal Civil Registrar, and the School Superintendent/Principal. It is the ERB which gives out the registration forms and which approves such when duly accomplished.
In the 2004 elections, the practice of bringing in flying voters had already been resorted to. Cases were filed with the Municipal Court for the exclusion of these non-resident voters, and most of them were actually expunged from the Voter’s List.
But why, you ask, has this been repeated again for the 2007 elections?
The blame falls with the Commission on Elections (Comelec). Criminal and administrative cases were filed against the members of the Llorente ERB for approving the registration of the non-residents: A couple of them had even placed in their registration forms that they are residents of
Instead of imposing sanctions on the ERB members who allowed these anomalies to happen, the Comelec in
And so the “inadvertence” has been repeated this time around. And it will be repeated again and again, until such time that the Comelec takes action against the perpetrators of this anomaly.
But will the Comelec ever do so? This is not expected to happen as long as Benjamin Abalos is the Chairman. He was, after all, placed in that position to make sure that electoral anomalies would take place so that the elections of 2004 would be decided by operators such as Commissioner Virgilio Garcillano, the will of the electorate be damned.
In other words, cheating intentionally takes place at the highest levels; it follows that cheating will also be resorted to at the local levels. And all these occur not just with the connivance – but even upon the initiative – of the Comelec, the body tasked with by the Philippine Constitution to ensure honest and fair elections.
“What of the Legislature? What can it do?”
Just take another look at what happened to Virgilio Garcillano … and despair.
First, he disappears. Then, upon surfacing, he lied through his teeth to Congressmen and to the Filipino people. He presented, as evidence in a solemn congressional hearing, a “clean” passport which was later certified by the Bangko Sentral – which prints the official Philippine passports – to be “irregular”. Expectedly, however, the charges of perjury and falsification filed against him by opposition lawmakers were dismissed by the Department of Justice.
And despite their saber-rattling, opposition lawmakers were no match against the administration congressmen. It was not mere numerical superiority that caused their defeat: it was because Garci also had them by the balls. It turned out that even opposition lawmakers – some, anyway – had actually sought Garci’s intercession to ensure their victories at the polls. No wonder they did not push their case to its logical conclusion. This is also probably why only a pipsqueak was heard from the opposition when the news broke that the Department of Justice had dismissed the charges against Garci.
On this aspect, even the Senate is not spotless. I was able to listen to the interminable Garci tapes (downloadable from the website of the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism) and recognized the voice of a senatorial re-electionist – God damn his soul! – who called up Garci to ensure his victory and even mentioned the amount he gave to an “operator” from the Comelec. The re-electionist almost made it, except that the one he almost bumped off got wise to the shenanigan and threatened to expose the entire electoral cheating at Comelec. A compromise had to be ironed out: the now-deceased former Senator backed out for a sum of money, while the “winner” exposed only the tip of the iceberg, just enough to say that he was being true to his principles.
So, can we trust Congress – whether the Lower or Upper House, or both – to make the changes? Maybe, once Lucifer has decided to return to the fold of God.
“Do these things happen only in the
This is not to say that lying, cheating and corruption do not happen in other countries. Politicians are politicians and they will always lie … brazenly or with dissimulation, and come hell or high water. As for cheating, one must remember that G.W. Bush won
What’s the difference, then? you might ask. The big difference is that, unlike in the
More importantly, their economies are well off, which means that their citizens can afford to feed themselves well. Thus, they take their governments seriously and are not wont to sell their votes for a sack of rice, or a case of beer. Nobody can gainsay the obvious fact that when a person is not worrying where the next meal is coming from, then he his mind is freed up to think about kicking the assholes out of city hall.
Take, for instance, the cabinet minister in a European country who was forced to resign because of non-payment of the taxes for having a TV in her house. In the
In other countries, their Justice departments or ministries will investigate, arrest and prosecute wrongdoers even if they are members of Parliament or even Prime Ministers. Just take a look at what’s happening to Ehud Olmert now, and to countless South Korean prime ministers. But in the
“Is everything lost, then?”
At this point in our history, it would seem so. That’s why so many of our kababayans choose to migrate to other countries, without even a thought of coming back (except for the occasional vacation during fiestas, weddings and funerals). In this country, only politicians, smugglers and drug lords have the capability of climbing the ladder of success, while the rest of the population are mired deeper and deeper in poverty each day. Politicians – consciously and subconsciously – do what they can to perpetuate this situation because they know once the populace is able to economically stand on their own two feet, lying and cheating and thievery would suddenly mean jail sentences for them.
I recall a friend who spent some time in
I subscribe to the view of Prof. Randy David that something positive is bound to result from this diaspora of Filipinos to the four corners of the globe. What they see, hear and experience in the countries which they have adopted as their own will, in one form or another, filter back to this side of the Pacific and will ultimately have an effect on those who – by choice and by circumstance – have been left behind.
It will not happen tomorrow, and maybe not even in my lifetime. But I choose to believe that not all is lost, that the majority of Filipinos will someday find their economic footing and thereby regain their dignity. It will take a lot of effort, although maybe not so much if only those who have left for greener pastures will plow back to their country of origin not only their experiences but also a little of the financial resources they have amassed by creating income-generating projects for those who remained behind.
When this happens, Filipinos will finally realize that their government is what and how they make it, and that they can do something about their government because government is a mere extension of themselves and not the tool of exploitation and oppression that their politicians have made it to be.
And when that happens, then maybe – even if only for a short time – we should bring back the death penalty and haul to the gallows the likes of Garcillano, his cohorts, and their ilk.